<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Nova Legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova</link>
	<description>Meeting the needs of Legal and Business Professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 18:04:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>David Reade Q.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/david-reade-q-c/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/david-reade-q-c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Key Authorities in Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Duggan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/?p=445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Reade is recognised as one of the country’s leading silks in commercial litigation and employment law. In the last [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>David Reade</strong> is recognised as one of the country’s leading silks in commercial litigation and employment law. In the last two years the directories have quoted clients as saying of David that he was “clear, practical and extremely effective”,  “a robust and fearless presence”, “able to deal with really knotty issues”, &#8220;vivacious, bold and brilliant&#8221;, “pleasingly straightforward” and “helpful in getting you out of a tight spot”.</p>
<p>Practising at <strong>Littleton chambers</strong>, he has appeared in many leading authorities, and in partnership with chambers colleague <strong><span style="color: #993366;">Michael Duggan</span></strong>, he edits the online  journal <span style="color: #993366;"><em><strong>Key Authorities in Employment Law</strong></em></span>, the first edition of which will be published later this year.<strong></strong><strong></strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/wp-content/uploads/AI Hess Pensions on Divorce">AI-Hess-Pensions-on-Divorce</a></strong><br />
<em></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/david-reade-q-c/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Final Blow to Promptitude</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/robert-mccracken-q-c-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/robert-mccracken-q-c-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 16:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert McCracken]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nova-legal.com/wpcms/?p=400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Administrative Court has accepted that, following Uniplex,  Claimants seeking permission to apply for judicial review no longer have to satisfy an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong>The Administrative Court has accepted that, following <em>Uniplex</em>,  Claimants seeking permission to apply for judicial review no longer have to satisfy an independent test of ‘promptitude&#8217; under CPR r.54.5 where their claim involves the enforcement of European Union Directives. The requirement in such cases is simply that claims be brought within 3 months of the relevant decision. It so held, following argument by Buglife, in <em>R(ota Buglife) v Medway Council &amp; National Grid &amp; Natural England. [2011] EWHC 746 (Admin).</em> Previously the courts had been inclined to say that the principle of <em>Uniplex</em> was confined to procurement cases and did not apply to environmental legislation deriving from the European Union.</p>
<p><strong>Robert McCracken QC</strong> and Rebecca Clutten of Francis Taylor Buildings represented Buglife.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.ftb.eu.com/members/robert-mccracken-qc.asp" target="_self"> </a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/robert-mccracken-q-c-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William Hanbury</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/william-hanbury-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/william-hanbury-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 15:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nova-legal.com/wpcms/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William Hanbury, barrister at Exchange Chambers, has been invited to become a part time member of the Upper Tribunal of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>William Hanbury</strong>, barrister at <span style="color: #993300;">Exchange Chambers</span>, has been invited to become a part time member of the Upper Tribunal of the Immigration and Asylum Chamber (formerly the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal).</p>
<p>On 15 February 2010, Immigration and Asylum Chambers were established in both tiers of the Unified Tribunals Framework created by the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007. The new Chambers replace the existing Asylum and Immigration Tribunal.</p>
<p>The Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) is a superior court of record dealing with appeals against decisions made by the First Tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) and will have the judicial review powers formerly held by the High Court in relation to immigration and asylum decisions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/william-hanbury-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nova Law &amp; Finance  Announce the Acquisition of Emplaw</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/nova-law-finance-announce-the-acquisition-of-emplaw/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/nova-law-finance-announce-the-acquisition-of-emplaw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Emplaw Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nova-legal.com/wpcms/?p=319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nova Law and Finance Ltd are pleased to announce the acquisition of Disclaw Publishing Ltd, publishers of Emplaw.co.uk, the online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nova Law and Finance Ltd are pleased to announce the acquisition of Disclaw Publishing Ltd, publishers of Emplaw.co.uk, the online resource for employment law professionals.</p>
<p>Founded by the respected lawyer Mr. Henry Scrope over 15 years ago, Emplaw is now recognized as the foremost authoritative online information service for all those working in the field of employment law.</p>
<p>Emplaw (<span style="color: #993300;">www.emplaw.co.uk</span>) delivers weekly and monthly updates on latest cases, new legislation, important press releases to over 7000 subscribers. The website features over 5000 pages of authoritative, cross-referenced material, more than 2500 expert case reports, and a comprehensive range of full precedents that help the lawyer determine the best form of contract or manual for their clients.</p>
<p>Nova are delighted to add this major online copyright to their growing list of acquisitions which, it is hoped, will make a significant contribution towards the company’s ambition to be recognized as the provider of quality legal information by the very best key opinion leaders in commercial, employment and family law.</p>
<p>As a result of an earlier acquisition, Nova already publish a number of well- established copyrights in employment, commercial and family law, with several major new works due for publication in both hard copy and online formats over the next 18 months.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/nova-law-finance-announce-the-acquisition-of-emplaw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Announcing Nova Law &amp; Finance &#8211; a new name in legal publishing</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/314/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/314/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 10:13:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Latest News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nova-legal.com/wpcms/?p=314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As our name suggests, Nova Law and Finance is a specialist publishing company serving the needs of the international legal, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong></strong>As our name suggests, Nova Law and Finance is a specialist publishing company serving the needs of the international legal, financial and business communities. Our aim is to provide the most accurate, timely and high-quality information in print and electronic formats, including; books, journals, webcasts, and other subscription-based products available on line.</p>
<p>Nova’s main areas of interest are Banking, Insurance, Financial and commercial litigation, Employment law, E-Commerce and Energy; our authors are recognised internationally as key opinion leaders in their fields.</p>
<p>Our intention is to work closely with the trade and professional bodies, to ensure that we provide the highest quality legal information in the most direct and efficient way possible. Our sales team are known and respected in the business and are there to ensure that you receive the information you need, to help you, do your job.</p>
<p>Please review our website for further details of our forthcoming publications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/09/314/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Prenuptial Agreements (2nd edition); Harris and Spicer</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/prenuptial-agreements-2nd-edition-harris-and-spicer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/prenuptial-agreements-2nd-edition-harris-and-spicer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 17:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nova-legal.com/wpcms/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harris and Spicer do not make the mistake of simply setting out precedents but put the whole subject in its [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Harris and Spicer do not make the mistake of simply setting out precedents but put the whole subject in its proper context. This means that there is a full discussion of the case law both before and including MacLeod and Radmacher which is also complimented by a relevant case law digest in one of the Appendices. Nor have they forgotten the need to ensure that any agreement drawn will not fail the test of enforceability – a careful analysis is provided to ensure that what the parties agree does not fall at the hurdle of the courts.</em></p>
<p><em>Both authors of this publication are experienced family practitioners whose expertise in this emerging area will prove invaluable to those who not only want to dip their toes in the water but are also prepared for a whole new voyage of discovery.</em></p>
<p>District Judge Stephen Gerlis</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>The subject of this book is …of the greatest topicality and interest for all of us who practise, in one way or another, in the field of family law. Having read it in proof, I am resolved to use it myself; and hope that you who have been kind enough to read this foreword may find it helpful to do likewise.</em></p>
<p>Lord Justice Wilson,<br />
Foreword to the First Edition</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/prenuptial-agreements-2nd-edition-harris-and-spicer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Employment Tribunals (6th edition); Goodier and Parkin</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/employment-tribunals-6th-edition-goodier-and-parkin/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/employment-tribunals-6th-edition-goodier-and-parkin/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nova-legal.com/wpcms/?p=244</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“Goodier and Parkin Employment Tribunals (Sixth Edition) is superb. Its stated aim is to provide “an accessible and authoritative guide” [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“<strong><em>Goodier and Parkin</em> Employment Tribunals (Sixth Edition) is superb.</strong></p>
<p>Its stated aim is to provide “an accessible and authoritative guide” to employment tribunal procedure. It succeeds entirely.</p>
<p>It is intended for the benefit of both lawyers and lay people involved in employment tribunals. It serves both constituencies extraordinarily well.</p>
<p>The book is both learned and lucid. Its depth, detail and insights will provide value for the most experienced practitioner. At the other end of the scale, it gives a wonderfully informative picture to an unrepresented litigant, extending even to the layout of the tribunal room and how to address the panel. It is unusual in covering many important aspects which are not the subject of rules of procedure –  for example skeleton arguments.</p>
<p>The book states the law and practice with great concision and clarity. But there are engaging asides. Indeed, one of the book’s great achievements is to intersperse illuminating comments without detracting from the simplicity of the proposition it has enunciated. On amendment of claims, for example, it notes, with a light touch, the illogicality of the position whereby out of time claims time are more easily included by amendment than by originating process, without obscuring the summary of what the law is. On joint expert reports it flags the “moot point” of whether the tribunal can order an unwilling party to contribute to the cost, without burdening the text with a digression.</p>
<p>The footnotes are well stocked with reported and unreported cases but (for example on sample claims) the authors do not hesitate to set out in the text a long quotation which contains all that need be said. On many topics (for example on submissions of no case to answer) the authors do not attempt to bring together all the discussions in the case-law but distil the essence admirably, with some brief citations.</p>
<p>The prose and layout rise to the challenge of even the most labyrinthine provisions (for example, the rules specifying the stages in an equal value claim and the intricate transitional rules on the abolition of statutory grievance and disciplinary procedures). The authors avoid the kind of diagrams and flow charts which can so easily illuminate the position for the writer whilst baffling the reader. Instead they use simple language, numbered lists and occasional tables, highlighting key concepts in bold. It works.</p>
<p><strong>This is an exceptional book.</strong> “</p>
<p>Christopher Jeans QC, 11 King&#8217;s Bench Walk</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>This is a book which makes the bold, and justified,  claim to be the complete guide to procedure in the Employment Tribunals. Bearing in mind the original avowed purpose of the Tribunal and the bracing injunction contained in the Rules of Procedure that Tribunals may regulate their own procedure and should seek to avoid formality it is a slightly dispiriting thought that such a book should be needed at all.<strong> Yet practitioners and judges know only too well that such a guide is indispensible and have cause to be grateful to Colin Goodier and Jonathan Parkin for their careful research and clear expression in this coherent and comprehensive survey of the subject.</strong></em></p>
<p><em><strong>This is a book which ought to find room on the desk of anyone with an employment law practice and on the shelves of Employment Judges.</strong> Its organisation of the material is lucid and logical. This is so not only in the ordering of the Chapters but of the text within each section, taking the reader logically through a topic and providing very helpful cross referencing and signposting which is clear evidence of the deep knowledge and expertise of the authors.</em></p>
<p><em><strong>Of particular note are the Chapters on Insolvency, Compensation and Conciliation, Mediation and Settlement.</strong> The former two deal with areas replete with pitfalls, in a manner calculated to instil confidence in the reader. The latter covers the crucial area of compromise agreements and deals with judicial mediation. Since both authors are trained mediators this is of particular value.</em></p>
<p><strong><em>I have turned almost daily to the 5<sup>th</sup> edition of this book and am delighted to see a new edition.</em></strong></p>
<p>Philip Rostant, Employment Judge</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>I have been an HR professional for forty years, both as an HR Director and independent Consultant.  In that time I have received many ET claims and directly participated in some twenty Tribunals.  <strong>I have only one really useful thing to say about this book – “Buy it!”  It’s a complete ‘no-brainer’.</strong></em></p>
<p><em>When I first became involved many years ago, Tribunal hearings rarely lasted for more than a day and both the law and the processes were easy to understand.  The huge increase in the complexity of the law has changed all that.  <strong>How does a working HR professional keep abreast of ET procedures?  The answer now is that you go to Colin Goodier and Jonathan Parkin’s book.</strong>  I wish I had had it years ago!</em></p>
<p><strong><em>You may never need to read it all, but the sections that are relevant to you will be absolutely invaluable.  They will enable you not only to have informed debates with your lawyer but to brief your own management with confidence and authority.</em></strong></p>
<p><strong><em>You’d expect it to be comprehensive, which it is.  But amazingly for such a technical subject, it’s also an easy read.  It will have paid for itself by the time you have handled your next ET claim.</em></strong></p>
<p>Graham Darbyshire MA MCIPD, Darbyshire Consulting Limited</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>The authors have managed to produce a book which presents complex legal processes in a readily readable and easily understood style. The book demonstrates why the original concept of Employment Tribunals, a simple forum for the determination of employment disputes, is but a memory in the minds of those practitioners who recall the days when informality and an absence of case law prevailed. <strong>Anyone who believes that the Employment Tribunal provides a forum where the unrepresented are on an equal footing with those using skilled employment law practitioners is well advised to read this book.</strong></em></p>
<p><em>The content of the book is well structured. The chapters flow from one subject area to another and there is a natural progression in terms of the process. Whilst describing each part of the process with sufficient detail to be used as an informative aide-memoir to employment law practitioners, the book uses language which enables less familiar or one off users of the Employment Tribunal to understand how the system works from initial presentation of the claim, through the conciliation and judicial determination stages ending with the enforcement of awards. The chapter on the calculation of tribunal awards is particularly useful to those seeking to draw up a schedule of loss in respect of their claim or the claim against them.</em></p>
<p><em>Although a legal textbook, the authors have allowed an element of their personal views, drawn from their experience as Judges, to permeate the content. There are a number of particularly useful insights which will enable those attending the employment tribunal to understand what they should and should not do to avoid damaging their own case.</em></p>
<p>Malcolm Boswell, Director, ACAS West Midlands</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><em>Employment tribunals started life as industrial tribunals under the Industrial Training Act 1964.  By comparison with today, employment matters were then relatively straightforward and the tribunals provided a ready and economical means of dealing with employment disputes.  The intervening years have seen a mushrooming of employment law, much emanating from the EU and most of this has been designed to give protected rights to employees according to their circumstances.  Those who are in practice as employment lawyers and many HR professionals will be fully up to speed with the latest state of the legislation and practice, despite its volume, but there will be many in HR departments who rarely become involved in employment tribunal cases and for whom the arrival of an issue can be very daunting.</em></p>
<p><em>This book meets the needs of both groups.  It is clearly written, well laid out, distinctly signposted and annotated with a multitude of explanatory footnotes and case references.  <strong>The work is comprehensive and authoritative and it will be of immense help to busy lawyers, representatives and HR departments who may have an involvement with employment tribunals, whether often or infrequently.</strong></em></p>
<p>Peter Maskell</p>
<p>Chief Executive, BHSF Group Limited</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/employment-tribunals-6th-edition-goodier-and-parkin/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OUR AUTHORS</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/our-authors/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/our-authors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 22:56:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ElectricStudio</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nova-legal.com/wpcms/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The success of any publishing company is founded on the standing of its authors, and the commercial appeal of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The success of any publishing company is founded on the standing of its authors, and the commercial appeal of the material they provide.</p>
<p>Our authors are among the leading practitioners in their fields, including barristers, in-house counsels and senior judges. We recruit the very best legal minds from the top law firms, in order to deliver for our readers the most up to date and authoritative opinion on new legislation and its implications both for them, and their clients.</p>
<p>To read more about our authors and the works we publish with them, please click on their individual links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/our-authors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rachel Spicer</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/rachel-spicer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/rachel-spicer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured Author]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nova-legal.com/wpcms/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rachel Spicer is a barrister at 1 Hare Court, where she specialises in all aspects of family finance, including financial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rachel Spicer </strong>is a barrister at 1 Hare Court, where she specialises in all aspects of family finance, including financial provision on divorce and child support. In partnership with <span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Iain Harris</strong></span> Rachel co-authors the best-selling title <span style="color: #800080;"><em><strong>Prenuptial Agreements</strong></em></span>, of which the second edition has recently been published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/rachel-spicer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iain Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/iain-harris/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/iain-harris/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 18:27:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jgregory</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Authors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nova-legal.com/wpcms/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Iain Harris has been a solicitor since 1977, with a significant part of his practice being concerned with matrimonial matters [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Iain Harris</strong> has been a solicitor since 1977, with a significant part of his practice being concerned with matrimonial matters and in particular prenuptial agreements and financial relief. He has sat regularly as a deputy district judge on the South East circuit since his appointment in 1998. In partnership with <span style="color: #993300;"><strong>Rachel Spicer</strong></span> Iain co-authors the best-selling title <em><strong><span style="color: #993366;">Prenuptial Agreements</span></strong></em>, of which the second edition has recently been published.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nova-legal.com/nova/2011/08/iain-harris/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

